Iraq War Essay

The American governance took the polemical stopping point of waging a war against Iraq. The circumstances and the motives of the American organisation sign that the war on Iraq was unwarranted and cannot be justified although the American government has put forward a few reasons for waging this war. The logic and evidence does not support much(prenominal) contentions by the American government. The American government has failed to unloosen its unilateral decision of declaring war against Iraq.In the year 2002, the American chair get a lineed his plan of ardouring the Iraqi regime as it was thought that Iraq was in the process of emerging as the greatest threat to the American security. This decision was apparently interpreted on the basis of the intelligence randomness that the US government causeed concerning Iraqs thermonuclear program. However, it is interesting to note that this intelligence info was kept secret until 2002. The major reason for this war was the te rrorist attack of the creative activity Trade Center in the year 2001.Obviously, this attack had left Americans at a state of shock as the successful terrorist attack show to the whole world that American security is at stake and that American military and intelligence power is not that efficient. (Powers 1) The knee jerk answer issueed in the decision to chalk out the proper plans to prevent the incoming attacks of the American territory. However, it is interesting to note that the American government could not obtain even the simple majority of the members of the UN Security Council.This clearly indicates that the United Nations did not wholeheartedly support the Iraqi venture initiated by the American government. The completion allies such as France and Germ whatsoever could not be convinced of the command for this war project as these countries felt that there was no need for any fresh attack on the Iraqi territory as afterwards 1991 this region was left in almost run d ownd state. The chairwoman was able to only convince the United States coition as the members of the coition did not question the necessity of a war on Iraq.The Congress members did not even participate in the debate regarding the Iraqi war. This shows that the American government could not convince the world leaders that Iraq was up to somewhat fresh mischief in the form of the production of armaments having the capacity to crush the world population. These details indicate that the American government has been alienated by other important powers which have not accepted the evidence presented by America that Iraq was emerging as another(prenominal) center of terrorist activities.(Powers 2) The principal(prenominal) furrow of the proponents of war was that Saddam Hussein possessed various dangerous weapons such as nuclear arsenals and chemical weapons which could have been used to destroy the opposite countries. The proponents of war asserted that the past history of Saddam s howed that he was an aggressor. Their another contention is that Saddam Hussein had connections with the Islamic terrorist organizations and the leaders such as Osama bin Laden who had played an important role in the twin towers attack.(Mearsheimer and Walt 1) These are the three reasons given by war supporters to justify the US aggression on Iraq. However, the proponents of war are not able to wax that Hussein really possessed Weapons of Mass Destruction (WMD). The UN inspections did not reveal that Iraq actually possessed or had the potential of building huge abode of WMD which could have been used for destructive purposes. The War mongers were aware of the position that their action would lead to huge expenses to the American treasury and that this war would result in the alienation of America in the world politics.Even thus they insisted that war was necessary as one could not afford to trim the possession of nuclear arsenals in the hands of the Iraqi leadership. In reality , the US had the power to contain the alleged Iraqi aggression. The argument that war was inevitable rests on the faulty logic. The war supporters are not able to go down up with substantial proof to nominate that Saddam had seriously move the plan of destroying his enemy countries. (Mearsheimer and Walt 4)However, in this context one should remember that after the Gulf war the allied forces had obtained entering into Iraq and they had used their energy to centralize the military power of Iraq. The Gulf war debacle was sufficient to deplete the Iraqi resources. Perhaps the American government undeniable to make a strong statement against Islamic terrorists after the September 11 attack. This resulted in the declaration of war on Iraq. This can be considered as the panorama saving attempt made by the American government.The newspapers have report information from CIA documents which contradicted the statements made by the President chaparral who asserted that Iraq was try to produce nuclear arsenals as the Iraqi officials had approached South Africa to obtain materials needed for producing nuclear weapons. However, CIA expressed doubt regarding this report that Iraq was trying to obtain nuclear weapon materials from South Africa. Another contention of the President was that the Iraqi officials refused entry of the weapon inspectors into Iraqi regions. However, there are evidences which refute this allegation.In reality, as the newspapers reported, the Iraqi government had offered their cooperation with the weapon inspectors. There is alike evidence to suggest that even before the beginning of war the American government obtained the information that Iraq did not approach South Africa to obtain nuclear weapon materials. This shows that the bush-league administration had deliberately misinterpreted the intelligence reports in order to obtain the support of the Congress members for this war. In spite of these contradictions Bush has defended his action of invading Iraq without any major reason. (Priest and Milbank A01)There are evidences to state that the US decision to attack Iraq has backfired and it has not add upd to the improvement of the US image in the international policy-making arena. The Iraq venture has resulted in the protest by the governments and people belonging to contrasting nations in the world which did not find any necessity for this war. (Martin 3) The main reason for this protest against the war is that this war was unjust. The extreme action taken by the US forces against the impeccant Iraqi civilians has come under semipublic criticism. This shows the world public opinion has not supported the idea of the US led campaign against Iraq.This war has enraged the Muslim nations and this may contribute to increase in the activities of the Muslim terrorist organizations leading to the loss of lives in divergent parts of the world. There is no evidence to state that the US government obtained the support of t he majority of the Americans for this war. The Iraq war has contributed to the creation negative image of Bush not only in the world politics but also in the US. In this sense, this war has not benefited the US people. Instead of increase the security of Americans, this war has increased the possibility of terrorist attack on the innocent American population. (Martin 4)Works CitedBracknell, Major Rob. Euro-bashing as Good Sport. oceanic War College Review. 58. 2, (2005) 139-142. Available at https//www.brookings.edu/