The Relationship Between Judged Attraction and Assumed Wealth

The Relationship amid Judged Attraction and Assumed Wealth A psychological Study Whether a person is aw atomic number 18 of it or not, constantlyywhere they go, they argon ment ally judging peck and creating an opinion some former(a)(a)s without necessarily ever eve meeting them. These judgments can be establish take out of candid fashion, or actions, or any new(prenominal) sort of visible formula of a person. Simply put, humans are judgmental creatures. One of the virtually common aspects of a persons life that is pretendd from outside appearance is riches.Assumedly, if a person dresses well, they must relieve oneself money to buy such a wardrobe. Though this is certainly not always the case, hatful generally assume that what is on the outside is reflected on the inside. In this examine, peoples visual interpretation of a person and the persons fictional wealth go away be examined. The participants will be shown pictures of random people of various wealth and asked to venture their monetary net worth. The variables existence canvas done this investigate are conceived showyness and monetary success.The goal of this experiment is to find a correlativity amongst the ii. Many studies concerning this phenomenon have been performed in the past and galore(postnominal) books on the subject of leader have been written. The consanguinity between forcible takingness and monetary worth has been an interest for scientists for many years. As long as in that location has been social class, people through the ages have been judging others wealth by their appearance, whether people have been conscious of it or not.These studies have been important because these two variables ( pleasingness and wealth) have also been linked to desire and favorability, two of the most unique and difficult of human emotions, as will be discussed in the next In an experiment conducted at Georgia Southern University by researchers Dawson and McIntosh, the re lationship between wealth, harmingness, and desirability was examined (Dawson & McIntosh, 2006). Dawson and McIntosh believed that men looked for physical good-naturedness in women, whereas women looked for material resources (wealth) in men.Alternatively, the experimenters predicted that if men and women were less advantageous in these physical and monetary traits, they would invent with other own(prenominal) traits, such as own(prenominal)ity. Participants to be evaluatord for the experiment were willy-nilly chosen from Yahoo Personals. Members of the opposite sex activity thusly rated the attracter of the participants and generated adjectives that were believed to delimitate the participant. For the male participants, it turned out that if they were considered less attractive or cockeyed by the raters, their profile would emphasize of other positive personal characteristics.On the other hand, for the females, on that point was a trending phenomenon that if a profile emphasized greatly on the womans physical attractiveness, it concentrated little on other personal characteristics. However, there was no relation between how physically attractive the rater bring the participant and what other positive characteristics were used to describe the participant. Dawson and McIntosh (2006) believed that their meditation was personal mannerrately meeted. The judgments that people catch up with on a persons physical attractiveness can influence much more than than the fabricated size of his or hers wallet.These judgments can influence decisions as important as whom to vote for in government elections. This phenomenon was studied by Hart, Ottati, and Krumdick at the University of aluminium and Loyola University. They hypothesized that the more attractive a candidate was, the more memorable their oppose was (Hart, Ottati, & Krumdick, 2011). Hart et. al. (2011), explored this by showing participants photos of potential candidates (all Democrat) al ong with campaign policies.The photos and breeding was then removed and the participants were asked to recite all the information that they could remember about all(prenominal) candidate and answer various questions regarding their attitudes and standpoints about the candidate and his or her campaign. The results show that those who were considered novices on the subject matter, being those that were unable to remember the candidates elaborate campaign and policy points, seemed to favor those that they found more physically attractive. Alternatively, those that were considered experts on the campaign material seemed to favor the less attractive of the candidates (Hart et. l, 2011). One office ask, however, what exactly is it of a person physique that lead people the pass judgment them as attractive? While most people look at a persons overall appearance and make judgments based on that, there are much subtler cues that a person subconsciously picks up on. Each persons tastes a re unique, and different cues supplicant to different people. Author Gordon L. Patzer Ph. D. described some of these cues in his book The physiological Attractiveness Phenomena (1985). Overall Patzer believed that personality was the main contributing factor. While physical first impressions are important, personality is what a person really remembers.A in effect(p) impressions is key. If a person makes a bad impression of themselves upon meeting someone, their negativity or foolishness will forever live on in he or shes new acquaintances eyes. afterwards personality, however, traits that spark attraction become much more minute and specific. First, Patzer believed that tiptop was a key contributor. Women have a tendency to be attracted to a man taller than herself, though not towering. Men, on the other hand, are attracted to women who are shorter than himself, but not unproportionately so. Even if one does not consciously realize it, they are taking note of everyones height t hat they meet.People also incur notice of someones facial aspects, such as compliance of the jaw, hairline, etc. (Patzer, 1985). Specific combinations of all of these aspects, plus many more, determine how attractive a person finds another. Whereas none of these traits have an scientific relation to personal wealth, they do play a key role on how attractive someone is initially judged as. Whenever a person meets someone new, they subconsciously judge the exotics appearance and determine what level of attraction if had towards the stranger, even if there is no intent to pursue romantically.Other assumptions then stem off of this initial judgment of attraction. One of the most common is the attempt to judge a strangers wealth by their appearance and personal attraction. Scientists have been exploring the relationship between attractiveness and monetary value for years. The following study attempts to spread more light on the subject. Methods This study was intentional to determine the correlativity between attractiveness and comprehend wealth. variants were defined as how personally attractive the look intoors found the estranged participants pictured versus how monetarily blind drunk the stranger was based on the surveyors attraction.The data was stash away using a Likert photographic plate to represent attractiveness and a outstrip with different levels of wealth. The results from the experiment allowed for the ratings of comprehend wealth to be compared to the rating of attractiveness and discover if a correlation did in fact exist between the two. Based on the results of the preliminary study, Attributions of physical attractiveness (Johnson, & MacEachern, 1985) attractiveness should influence the perception of desirable traits, such as wealth.This may result for a multitude of reasons to be discussed in the future. Participants The participants attemptd were the 10 females and 10 males pictured in the slide show. The participants varied all a ges, ethnicities, and states of wealth in an attempt to make the samples characteristics vocalization of the public and mildly random. All participants were retrieved off of Google with some strategy to make sure that characteristics were varied in an attempt to be representative, making it a stratified sample.Also participating were the surveyors who rated the sample of participants. The surveyors consisted of a cluster sample of the Flagler College PSY 253 class. The sample totaled 17 12 females and 5 males. Considering that the sample consisted of college students, take for grantedly between the ages of 19 and 22, the surveyors were not necessarily representative of the public but rather of college students in general. The participating surveyors received no compensation other than class fellowship and attendance points, which were awarded simply for showing up to the class. MaterialsFor the experiment, a Powerpoint was used with 20 photos of participants, strangers to the sur veyors, obtained off of Google 10 pictures of females and 10 pictures of males, one per slide. Materials also included a paper survey handout on which the participants would record their responses. The survey consisted of two scales, one Likert scale rating attractiveness and one rating wealth. The Likert scale ran from 1-10 with one with the least attractive and ten the most and the scale for wealth ran from Poor($0-1000)-Average($1000-999,999)-Millionaire-Billionaire (See Appendix A).The participants provided their own writing utensils (pens and pencils). Procedure All participating surveyors were stipulation a single handout survey (See Appendix A) by the administrators and then instructed to record their gender on the handout. Each surveyors gender determined whether they would be in Group A (Females) or Group B (Males). twain bases were instructed that they would be shown a slide show consisting of pictures of different individuals of the opposite sex and asked to record the ir opinions on attractiveness and wealth on the paper survey provided for each picture shown.Each picture was shown for approximately ten seconds and a in all of ten pictures were shown for each group. Group A was administered the survey first. The surveys were then sedate by the administrators and a slideshow with ten different pictures was shown to Group B and the participants were asked to take away out the same survey as the prior group. The surveys were then collected by the administrators, concluding the experiment. Results Data was collected using a between subjects design. This experiment examined the correlation between how a person perceives attractiveness and how wealthy the person is then assumed to be.The experiment had two variables inconsistent 1, perceived attractiveness, and Variable 2, assumed wealth. Participants were administered a survey listing the two variables, Variable 1 was measured on a Likert Scale of 1-10, when Variable 2 was measured on a scale of 1 (Poor, $0=1,000), 2 (Average, $1,000-$999,999), 3 (Millionaire), and 4 (Billionaire). The mean value for Variable 1 was M=4. 12 with a standard deviation of SD=1. 13314 and the mean value for Variable 2 was M=2. 36 with a standard deviation of SD=. 33066 (refer to control panel 1).The median for Variable 2 was 3 and the mode is 2. The median and the mode for Variable 2 were both 2. The Pearson Correlation for the experiment was r=. 05 and the deduction for each variable was p=. 891. This made the studys decision significant and that there is a strong correlation between our variables. treatment At the beginning of the experiment, it was hypothesized that there would be a positive correlation between how physically attractive someone was conceived as by a stranger and how wealthy they were assumed to be, judged on their rated attractiveness.At the end of the experiment, the results support this hypothesis. The deduction of the variables was p=. 891, demonstrating that there is a high up correlation between how attractive someone perceives a stranger and how wealthy the stranger is assumed to be, sustain the hypothesis. The positive correlation of the results suggests that the more attractive a person finds a stranger, the more monetary value the stranger is assumed to have. The Pearson Correlation was r=. 05 which proves that these results were reliable.The fact that r=. 05 means that the results were very specific, with few outliers, and can be condensed to a confined ranged of results, which all fit in together to support the hypothesis. Also, the low standard deviations of SD=1. 12212 and SD=. 33066 show how little overall variation there is to the variable means among participants. The results of this study can be interestingly link up to the results of other studies previously performed, while the studies themselves may not mirror each other.As discovered by Dawson and McIntosh (2006), men and women on dating websites, if considered less attractive , emphasis more of their personal traits (Dawson & McIntosh, 2006). Though it was not a component of the study being examined, some participants in the photos, when less attractive, dressed better, in crackle clothing, while those who were deemed more attractive tended to wear less flashy clothes. perhaps if a person does not consider themselves to be physically appealing, they will try to look nice in other ways in public, such as clothing.Previously discussed, an experiment by Hart, Ottati, and Krumdick (2011) revealed that voters are more in all probability influenced by and likely to remember candidates that are perceived as more physically attractive and tend to think higher said attractive candidates (Hart et. al, 2011). This could have a relation to the current experiment in the prise that the survey takers may have had higher expectations of the participants monetary value if considered more attractive. This could be because people have a tendency to hold high hopes and expectations for those they find desirable.The experiment at hand has no relation, however, to the third hypothesis Previously discussed by Patzer (1985). Patzer (1985) believed that there is a combination of specific attributes that causes a person to be attracted to another person. A specific feature that Patzer discussed was height, being that females prefer taller men and males vice versa (Patzer, 1985). However, there was no way for the surveyors to judge the participants height to their own through the pictures shown during the survey. For this experiment at least, height had nothing to do with personal attraction or attractions relation to wealth.There were very few flaws to this experiment that would have change the results. The only obvious flaw was the issue of inner orientation. For surveying ease, the experimenters change integrity the groups into male and female, rather than by sexual orientation because while attracted to males and attracted to females are two cle ar groups, there may have been bisexuals in the existence and they would not have been able to take the survey twice. So though some surveyors may have felt that they were in the wrong group and it may have had an effect on the results, it effects were nothing detrimental.If retell in the future, perhaps the experiment would involve surveys more catering to sexual orientation rather than being limited to division of gender. On the other hand, while there may have been a flaw, there was no experimenter bias because each participants correct wealth was never hinted at until the end. Also, it was inconceivable for the surveyors to develop practice effects because the survey involved no technique or talent. Also, there was no difficulty level so there was no floor or ceiling effects. In conclusion, the original hypothesis was supported.There was a positive correlation between perceived attractiveness and assumed monetary wealth, this meaning the more attractive a person found a stra nger, the person then tended to assume the stranger proportionately more wealthy. There may be more triggers behind this phenomenon but judging by the survey results, the correlation was at least fueled by the attractiveness variable. References Dawson, B. L. , & McIntosh, W. D. (2006). Sexual strategies theory and internet personal advertisements. CyberPsychology & Behavior, 9 (5). Retrieved from http//research. flagler. du9005/ehost/ item? vid=11&hid=110&sid=29028bce-cb55-42c1-b1e2-571b81dcc38f%40sessionmgr110&bdata=JnNpdGU9ZWhvc3QtbGl2ZQ%3d%3ddb=aph&AN=22677445 Hart, W. , Ottati, V. C. , Krumdick, N. D. (2011). Physical attractiveness and candidate evaluation a model of correction. Political Physology, 32 (2). Retrieved from http//research. flagler. edu9005/ehost/detail? vid=5&hid=110&sid=29028bce-cb55-42c1-b1e2-571b81dcc38f%40sessionmgr110&bdata=JnNpdGU9ZWhvc3QtbGl2ZQ%3d%3ddb=aph&AN=58702305 Patzer, G. L. (1985). The physical attractiveness phenomena. Los Angeles, CA Plenum Pres s

Foil Characters in “A Doll’s House” Essay

Henrik Ibsen creates char spellers in A hoots dwelling who change throughout the play. Ibsens use of resist characters helps the reader gain severally individual character better. Some of the characters in the play be perceived as opposites besides in fact sh ar several(prenominal) similarities. Krogstad and Torvald, Christine and Nora, and Krogstad/Christines relationship and Torvald/Noras relationship argon all foils to to each one(prenominal) other. Foil characters are reflect images of each other they do similarities as well as differences.Nils Krogstad and Torvald Helmer are foils to each other. They some(prenominal) have children and are lawyers, even though Krogstad lost his license because he did a forgery. Krogstad did something unlawful but so did Torvald Torvald helped Noras military chaplain when he had done a bad thing. Torvald and Krogstad were childhood friends and now they work together at the bank. withal though they have the same professions as each o ther, Torvalds go down at the bank is much higher than Krogstads.Everyone hates Krogstad because he did an poorlyegal act on the other hand, everyone loves Torvald. The idea that Krogstad is the villain of the play is reinforced by the reactions that Nora displays whenever Krogstad is around.The reader eventually understands that Krogstad is a victim to circumstances he act forgery to help his children, not to help himself. Krogstad is hated by others for the discourtesy he committed to help his children, yet Torvald is loved even though he committed a dishonest act to serve himself. Torvald helped Noras father in order to win favor with Nora and attain her as his wife. Krogstad no longer has a wife because she, Christine, left him for silver.Christine Linde and Nora Helmer are greatly dissimilar but also share some comparisons. Very much like Krogstad and Torvald, Nora and Christine were childhood friends. Before their meeting in Act 1, these cardinal women had not seen each other in nearly ten years. Christine and Nora are nearly opposites of each other Nora has children, money, and a conserve, Christine is a poor leave behind with no offspring.Christine is an independent woman who has been out in the macrocosm and has held seven-fold jobs. Nora is seen as a child who does not have knowledge of how the humans works because she is trapped in adollhouse. Christine supports this idea when she calls Nora a child and says, For you (Nora) know so little of the burdens and troubles of life.(Act 1) When the reader learns what Nora did for Torvald, it shows that Nora is more capable than she seems which is a characteristic that Christine also possesses.In order for Nora to pay bum the loan she took, Nora did repair work for extra money. Nora and Christine both had a down in the mouth parent who needed their help, which caused them to make a tough decision and they each chose the most important person to them. The 2 couples in A Dolls House, coincident ally, are foils to each other. Society sees Nora and Torvald Helmer as a perfectly happy couple. On the other hand, Krogstad and Christines relationship is looked down upon because Christine plain left him for money.Christine elected to leave her husband, Krogstad, so she could make more money to help her brothers and her sick mother. Nora chose to help her sick husband instead of her ill father during his dying days. The Helmers relationship looks stronger because Nora chose her husband over her father but in fact, her decision shows how much Nora is under Torvalds control. Christine and Krogstad genuinely have the better relationship because they have adult conversations and work their problems out. These two couples are fundamentally opposites of each other except for the fact that they both become separated at some point.Christine and Krogstad truly love each other because they have both been out in the real world and want to be together. The Helmers do not have authorized l ove because Nora has never been out of her dollhouse to experience the world for herself. Nora and Torvalds relationship is more similar to father/daughter rather than husband/wife. Torvald loves Nora as more of a daughter and cares more slightly what others return of him rather than what she thinks. Torvald From now on, forget happiness.Now its just about saving the remains, the wreckage, the appearance. (Act 3). Torvald is extremely self-loving in his relationship with Nora Krogstad is not selfish at all in his relationship with Christine. Christine and Krogstad are able to process their issues together as adults. The main characters in this play have foil characters who are there to support them and help the reader understand the story. sealed characters seem to be opposites of each other while also having similarities.Krogstad and Torvald have similar jobs and families, but are also quite dissimilar. Christine and Nora were childhood friends but grew up in different worlds. The relationship between Christine and Krogstad and the Helmers relationship differs because Krogstad and Christine truly love each other and the Helmers do not. Even though these characters do have similarities to each other, they are almost exact opposites they are mirror images of each other.

Macbeth Newspaper Article Essay

The flow of blood stopped and History recorded a sad death. King Duncan over ten years was the most trusted noble. He was a safe and Godly man, friend to the poor and defender of the downtrodden. He had been given the title, Thane of Fife. But he is no more with us. Our King Duncan was polish off last night according to the Scotland police authority. King Duncan was assassinated during his stay on at Macbeths castle in the early morning on (May 12). He died surrounded by those that loved him and his legacy will support on. Duncans two guards were considered the main suspects, but were slaughtered by Macbeth at the scene. part has conformed the two guards responsible, but has no plan to charge Macbeth either. General Banquo told the police, everything looked good in the dinner.Duncan seemed to have a pleasure time that night. He inform Macbeth and Lady Macbeth as the best host and hostess in the instauration and had several dances with Lady Macbeth. They had been celebrating u ntil eleven p. m. late at night. When the celebration finished, his majesty King Duncan retired back to his room. Other witnesses also agreed with Banquos statement. However, in the next morning, Duncan was strand dead in his own bed. Nobel Macduff was the one who has found the Kings body.Macduff told the police, he and Nobel Lenox arrived at the castle with some different servants around 730 am. Everyone in the castle seemed still quiescence at that time. They knocked the gate several times before the porter exposed it. Then, Macbeth led two to the Kings chamber. While Macbeth and Lenox stayed there discussing the shuddery storm on Friday night, Macduff discovered horrible scene along. O abuse, Horror, Horror Tongue nor heart can conceive nor name thee Macduff cried (Pg 65, line 73).

Eggplant to floor wax introduction Essay

One of the many problems of any home or infrastructure is keeping the shininess and the cleanliness of the grade and only thing that clear up this possible is the product called Floor full it is applied on floor jumps to make it scuff-resistant, water-resistant, slip resistant and glossy. It provides a thin, protective and hard surface layer when applied to flooring.In this modern age, floor polishes is make from celluloid materials and with the advancement of synthetics so does floor wax, each passing day everywhere half a million people are using floor wax even as we speak someone is using it save of all the useful traits that floor wax gives us at our floors in that respect are always disadvantages to it and the first disadvantage is our environment, since floor wax is made out of highly synthetic materials its is non-biodegradable.The second is that floor wax contains virulent substances that can either bugger off severe damage to humans and fleshly life if came in co ntact. Third is prolong exposure of its unpleasant intuitive feeling can cause different problems throughout the body. Fourth is that it can cause damage to the plants since floor wax contains volatile substances that can block plants from doing photosynthesis scorn the recent efforts by various organizations efforts to educate the public about the poisonous dangers of floor wax no one seems to believe them due to the effectuality of the modern floor wax but still its harming our environment.Our research aims to allot these problems away through the use of brinjal leaves, by the use of eggplant leaves we can eliminate the problems of toxic materials exposing human and plants and making the floor wax safe to dispose at the environment because it can degrade all over time plus making it 2 times more cheaper and the nigh important part is we can retain results, texture and luster of a commercially produced floor wax.

Analysis of Maus: the Animal Behavioral Stance Essay

I want to use Maus as my analysis. I nip analogous you can gain insight into this blend more easily because the connections Spiegelman employ was so closely related to how state view society. The intentionality behind it so obvious, try to tell the myth of a World War two survivor in way that people could relate to without bulgeting likewise emotionally evolved. Its like Arts psychiatrist says to Art, Im not talking about YOUR book now, but compute at how many books have already been written about the Holocaust. Whats the point? People havent changed Maybe they need a newer, bigger Holocaust. I think what he was trying to say is that intimately people dont understand what those survivors really went through. There is about a thousand different depictions of the Holocaust, but none that tell the story like Maus does.Its something about the way you see through Vladeks eyes, as a mouse rather than human, that perhaps makes it easier for us to get it. However, the types of an imals he used made it a little complicated to not get involved emotionally. Viewing the Jews as vermin and the Germans as cats trying to exterminate those vermin, made it even more real, I felt. The way people feel like the Polish are dirty people (pigs) and how Americans feel they can conquer or take anything they feel (dogs), just adds to the subjectiveness of the situation. We want to feel for the mice as the cats treat them so, but we only deal mice as vermin, not hopeless creatures being picked on, or exterminated in this case, by the creature in higher power.On top of that, I believe the Behavioral Stance (animals are intelligent and are subject of associative learning, that is they are capable of grasping that certain actions or a certain chain of events are linked to others) applies to this novel because when Vladek is continually determination a way to provide or hide his family, shows that he has an arrangement of the horrors that could possibly happen to him if they w ere captured.

Investigating the effect of pH on the activity of phosphatase enzymes

My film in this experiment is to look into how well an enzyme (phosphatase in this case) reacts under a controlled temperature but a varying pH.Enzymes are known to be accomplished by pH and temperature. Both of these change how tenderly the enzyme prat bidding a substrate, so perfect matches must be found for distributively enzyme. At a low temperature, the enzymes answer is so slow that each product is concentratedly noticeable. At a high temperature, or an extreme pH, the active site of the enzyme is damaged, so the substrate cannot be processed.I previse that the optimal pH for the reply to take place will be more acidic when the temperature is set at 25o c and the length of brooding is 10 minutes. A suitable pH would be between 3 5oc.I conducted preliminary experiments and chose to incubate at 25o c instead of the high temperatures for the simple reason that I knew that at a higher temperature (around 35o c), the reaction would go at its fastest, and I ran the ris k of high chromatic value (I wanted to keep them whole under 1 so they could be easily compared). I therefore wanted to ascertain what would bump at lower than 35o c as far as reactions were concerned, so I chose 25o c.My system was adapted from a workingsheet on varying the temperature in the said(prenominal) reaction, keeping pH constant.1. Label a microfuge pipage with your initials.2. Place deuce mung beans into the labeled tube.3. Add 0.5ml distilled wet into the tube containing the beans.4. Crush and knock off the beans with a small glass/plastic rod.5. Take a plunk for microfuge tube and increase weewee to the same level as the whizz containing the mung beans. (TO BALANCE THE CENTRIFUGE RACK)6. Place the tubes into opposite holes of the centrifuge outdoor stage and spin for 5 minutes at maximum speed7. after(prenominal) spinning, draw off as much of the clear supernatant supra the pellet as possible and place into a clean microfuge tube. This firmness now c ontains the enzymes for the experiment.8. Using a graduated pipettor, add 100?l of sodium carbonate (the buffer solution in this experiment).9. Then add 20?l PPP substrate to each of the eight microfuge tubes. muffle the pippettor thoroughly.10. Finally, add 20?l enzyme solution into it.11. Repeat steps 8 through 10 as quickly as possible, to collect all the microfuge tubes. at once insert them into a Styrofoam float and place this on the bulge of the piddle bath for 10 minutes, sequenced with a stop clock.12. Now add 100?l Sodium Carbonate to stop the reactions.13. hazard the colour of the magenta using the magenta filters provided.The possible variables in this method are the volumes of substrate, enzyme and sodium carbonate along with the time in the water bath and the temperature of the water bath. The volumes will be measured as well-nigh as possible with a micropippettor.ResultsThe number in the test tube column is the magenta filter that corresponded to the colour of th e completed reaction. The higher numbers mean more reaction, lower means less reaction.E very time that I added the sodium carbonate to cancel the reaction, the colour change to magenta was sudden and with a small sum total of shaking, the whole liquid was tinted purple.I managed to take 2 readings for each pH, and therefore average them. Without doing the preliminary experiment, I would rush never known what temperature to try.This graph shows clearly how good my results were. They adequate with my prediction that the optimum pH for a Phosphate enzyme is around pH 3-5, and therefore we can say that it requires a more acidic pH than an alkaline one.My conclusion, using this graph as evidence, is that a Phosphate enzyme works at its maximum speed at a lower pH, in this experiment pH 4, taking into account the other variables in the experiment. For instance, at a different water temperature, the pH required may vary.As mentioned before, as the temperature raises, so does the proba bility of denaturation. From the results, I assume this is beginning to happen before pH 5. But these results are not precise. I have no way of knowing which side of pH 4 the reaction is faster, i.e. if pH 3.9 is faster than pH 4, or pH 4.1. The pH4 that I got as being the fastest speed may not be the aggrandisement of the reaction curve.Huge accuracy errors could have been made, for instance* Was the precise relate amount of liquid put in each of the tubes? Probably not, the micropipette was hard to use and had very small scales.* Some reactions began before others when preparing to put the microfuge tubes into the water bath. You had to work incredibly quickly to prepare all of the tubes in as fast a time as possible.However, seeing how precise my results were, each I made the same mistakes over and over, therefore giving a whole set of incorrect results, or I did them all very well. This is the risk in using this method. If I were to change the method, I would worry far more precise pipettes and find a way of adding the enzyme into the solution as quickly as possible, like getting 8 micropipettes make full and ready, then using one for each microfuge tube in quick succession.If this experiment was to be taken further, I would get people to work together and double check their accuracy as they go, so that they can do the final step before incubation in half the time or less. Instead of changing the pH, they could change the variable concerning the temperature of the water bath to be incubated in. Another possibility is that the different volumes could be changed to see how the results vary, of course only one at a time. For example, change the amount of enzyme to be put into the mixture, continue the experiment with other set variables and see what type of results you get.

Outsiders Compare and Contrast

The Outsiders withstand and motion-picture show were all told different, just they still had some similarities. Like how they both talk intimately the lives of the pillowcases, for example the movie doesnt talk more or less Johnnys abusive parents or any of the socs. In the discussion they talk about bobs and cheery valances life. There are a lot of appearance-related differences. For instance, Dallys hypothetical to create this lynx-like, almost elfin look with ungreased hair so blond its nearly white. Sodas hair is suppositional to be dark gold.Ponys hair is supposed to be like Sodas hair but slightly redder. Steves hair is supposed to be slicked back in very complicated glowering swirls. Two-Bits supposed to be tall with rusty hair and exaggerated sideburns. The movie cut out all of the Sandy drama I fancy the movie made Two-Bit more serious. He cracked some jokes, but the book made him out to be fiercely playful and whatnot, almost always being wise. The movie place d a bit of dialect not much, but still on Dallys necklace, which was nonexistent in the book. In the movie, he wore a St.Christopher medallion. The movie made Soda seem comfortably less intellectual than the book made him out to be that is, the book made it clear he was naturally a happy mortal who got drunk off life, but in the movie, he was awfully happy a lot of the time so the audience didnt know this character trait. The movie skims over Ponys illness after the rumble, during which time Randy visits their home. The habitue movie edition skips the entire first chapter pretty solidly, but the drawn-out opening does tell you about the first chapter.The movie makes no point of reference of Sodas horse, Mickey Mouse. It also ignores Sodas past dabbling in rodeo bronco-riding. In the movie, the Socs are from the southeasterly side of town and the greasers are from the north. In the book, the Socs are from the west and the greasers from the east. In the movie, when Pony come s home from the lot at two in the morning, Darry shoves him sturdy and he falls. In the book Darry just slaps him across the face.The movie, understandably, drops some of the josh between Two-Bit and Marcia at the movies. As far as I immortalise the movie didnt include Dally messing around. Little scenes like Dally terrorizing those kids werent in the book. The movie showed Dally alone at the store when he held it up, whereas the book didnt describe that. The movie showed Ponys dreams. The movie never mentions that girl who looks good in yellow, the one who called Pony a hood when he whipped out his brand during class to cut a worm.